Social Media and e-government to prevent corruption in Indonesia Villages

Adjie Rosyidin; Arief Yoga Pangestu; Austin Fascal Iskandar; Darusalam Darusalam

doi:10.31763/businta.v7i1.212

Authors

Adjie Rosyidin Universitas Negeri Malang
Arief Yoga Pangestu Universitas Negeri Malang
Austin Fascal Iskandar Universitas Negeri Malang
Darusalam Darusalam University Teknologi Mara, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v7i1.212

Keywords:

Anti-corruption, indonesia, vilage funding, corruption

Abstract

Examining the anti-corruption movement in Indonesia, this paper will give a review of the topic. The primary goal of this analysis is to discover whether or not e-government and social media can serve as an efficient weapon in the fight against corruption in Indonesian village budgets. This research evaluates corruption from several behavioral angles. To evaluate the efficacy of social media and e-government in combating corruption in Indonesia's village funds, researchers conducted a comprehensive literature review and normative juridical analysis using a conceptual approach. The study demonstrates that ICT's rapid expansion and improvement in Indonesia has had far-reaching consequences. The participants share and discuss corruption-related news and information. Because traditional punishment-oriented tactics have not been effective in eradicating corruption in Indonesia, incorporating technology into future efforts to do so might boost the likelihood of success.

Author Biographies

Adjie Rosyidin, Universitas Negeri Malang

Arief Yoga Pangestu, Universitas Negeri Malang

Austin Fascal Iskandar, Universitas Negeri Malang

References

M. Kayrak, “Evolving challenges for supreme audit institutions in struggling with corruption,” J. Financ. Crime, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 60–70, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1108/13590790810841707.

“Performance Accountability and Combating Corruption,” Perform. Account. Combat. Corrupt., Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6941-8.

A. K. Clark, “Measuring Corruption: Transparency International’s ‘Corruption Perceptions Index,’” vol. 29, pp. 3–22, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1108/S2053-769720170000029001.

J. S. T. Quah, “Learning from Singapore’s effective anti-corruption strategy: Policy recommendations for South Korea,” Asian Educ. Dev. Stud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 2017, doi: 10.1108/AEDS-07-2016-0058.

R. Di Pietra and A. Melis, “‘Governance and corruption: is history repeating itself?’ Fostering a debate and inviting contributions from a multidisciplinary perspective,” J. Manag. Gov., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 689–701, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1007/S10997-015-9326-0.

J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, and J. M. Grimes, “Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 78–91, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1108/17506161211214831.

L. B. Ngouo, “Responsibility and transparency in governmental organizations in Cameroon: A review of institutional arrangements,” Int. Rev. Adm. Sci., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 475–492, Dec. 1997, doi: 10.1177/002085239706300403.

S. T. Akindele, “Critical Analysis of Corruption and its Problems1 in Nigeria,” Kamla Raj Enterp., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7–18, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/09720073.2005.11890876.

O. J. Ibitoye, A. A. Ogunoye, and E. P. J. Kleynhans, “IMPACT OF RECESSION ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA,” J. Econ. Financ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 207–221, 2022, doi: 10.4102/jef.v15i1.796.

A. S. Bakare, “The crowding-out effects of corruption in Nigeria: An empirical study,” E3 J. Bus. Manag. Econ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 059–068,. Available at: ideas.repec.org

M. J. Moon, “The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 424–433, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00196.

M. H. Simarmata, “Peranan e-Government dan Media Sosial untuk Mewujudkan Budaya Transparansi dan Pemberantasan Korupsi,” Integritas J. Antikorupsi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 203–230, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.32697/INTEGRITAS.V3I2.108.

C. K. Kim, “Anti-Corruption Initiatives and E-Government: A Cross-National Study,” Public Organ. Rev., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 385–396, May 2014, doi: 10.1007/S11115-013-0223-1.

M. J. Magro, “A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government,” Adm. Sci. 2012, Vol. 2, Pages 148-161, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 148–161, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.3390/ADMSCI2020148.

A. Mayfield, “What İs Social Media?,” Icrossing, pp. 1–36, 2008, [Online]. Available: http://www.icrossing.co.uk/fileadmin/uploads/eBooks/What_is_Social_Media_iCrossing_ebook.pdf

“File:Thrips (15817836204).jpg - Wikimedia Commons.” https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thrips_(15817836204).jpg (accessed Jun. 25, 2023).

J. Riddell, A. Brown, I. Kovic, and J. Jauregui, “Who are the most influential emergency physicians on twitter?,” West. J. Emerg. Med. Integr. Emerg. Care with Popul. Heal., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 281–287, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.5811/WESTJEM.2016.11.31299.

J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, and J. M. Grimes, “Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 264–271, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.GIQ.2010.03.001.

“NVivo 11 for Windows Help - About social network analysis.” https://help-nv11.qsrinternational.com/desktop/concepts/about_social_network_analysis.htm.

“NVivo 11 for Windows Help - Understand sociogram centrality measures.” http://help-nv11.qsrinternational.com/desktop/concepts/understand_sociogram_centrality_measures.htm.