The Readiness Analysis of Smart School Implementation Using Technology Readiness Index to Support Smart City Implementation

Authors

  • M. Khairul Anam STMIK Amik Riau
  • Indra Prayogo STMIK Amik Riau
  • Susandri STMIK Amik Riau
  • Yoyon Efendi STMIK Amik Riau
  • Erlin Pelita Indonesia Institute of Business and Technology
  • nurjayadi STMIK Amik Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v6i2.507

Keywords:

Smart schools, Junior High School 17 Pekanbaru, Technology Readiness Index, Pekanbaru

Abstract

Smart Schools have been widely applied in several schools within the scope of education and services as they are being encouraged to support Smart City. Smart Schools is a school concept utilizing information technology used in the teaching and learning process in the class and school administration. One of the schools in Pekanbaru City that will implement intelligent schools in Junior High School 17 Pekanbaru. Building smart schools themselves is adequate infrastructure such as servers, labor, and integrated systems and the readiness of schools and students to implement Smart Schools in the future. Therefore, to determine the readiness level of prospective users of the Smart Schools concept, the technology readiness index (TRI) method with four personality variables; optimism, innovativeness, discomfort, and insecurity. The purpose of this research was to find out the readiness index of prospective users in the implementation of Smart Schools and see what factors need to be improved from the readiness of prospective users. This research was expected to help Junior High School 17 prepare schools to become Smart Schools to support smart city implementation in Pekanbaru

References

F. Anindra, S. H. Supangkat, and R. R. Kosala, “Smart Governance as Smart City Critical Success Factor (Case in 15 Cities in Indonesia),” Proceeding - 2018 Int. Conf. ICT Smart Soc. Innov. Towar. Smart Soc. Soc. 5.0, ICISS 2018, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICTSS.2018.8549923.

Pekanbaru City Government, Pekanbaru Mayor Regulation No 56 of 2019 Concerning the Pekanbaru Smart City Master Plan. 2019. [Online]. Available at: Available at: https://jdih.pekanbaru.go.id/ .

G. Meiwanda, “Challenges of Smart City: Local Government in Pekanbaru City and Community,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Indonesian Association for Public Administration (IAPA 2019), Mar. 2020, pp. 40–53, doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200301.003.

E. Estopace, “Next up: School ID that doubles as payment card,” Philstar, 2017. Accessed Apr. 13, 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://www.philstar.com/business/technology/2017/02/20/1673272/ .

R. Phungsuk, C. Viriyavejakul, and T. Ratanaolarn, “Development of a problem-based learning model via a virtual learning environment,” Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 297–306, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.kjss.2017.01.001.

A. Lutfi, F. Saidi, and M. Watfa, “A ubiquitous smart educational system: Paving the way for big educational data,” in 2016 Sixth International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH), Aug. 2016, pp. 233–238, doi: 10.1109/INTECH.2016.7845129.

M. Ali and L. Miller, “ERP system implementation in large enterprises – a systematic literature review,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 666–692, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-07-2014-0071.

H. Barham and T. Daim, “The use of readiness assessment for big data projects,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 60, p. 102233, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102233.

K. Al-Osaimi, A. Alheraish, and S. H. Bakry, “An integrated STOPE framework for e-readiness assessments,” 2006. [Online]. Available at : https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ .

A. Parasuraman, “Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A Multipleitem Scale To Measure Readiness To Embrace New Technologies,” J. Serv. Res., vol. 2:307, no. May, 2000, doi: 10.1177/109467050024001.

S. Ali, H. Ullah, M. Akbar, W. Akhtar, and H. Zahid, “Determinants of Consumer Intentions to Purchase Energy-Saving Household Products in Pakistan,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1462, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11051462.

M. Martens, O. Roll, and R. Elliott, “Testing the Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model for Mobile Payments Across Germany and South Africa,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag., vol. 14, no. 06, p. 1750033, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1142/S021987701750033X.

A. Ariani, D. Napitupulu, R. Jati, J. Kadar, and M. Syafrullah, “Testing of technology readiness index model based on exploratory factor analysis approach,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1007, no. 1, p. 012043, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1007/1/012043.

C. O’Farrelly, A. Booth, M. Tatlow-Golden, and B. Barker, “Reconstructing readiness: Young children’s priorities for their early school adjustment,” Early Child. Res. Q., vol. 50, pp. 3–16, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.12.001.

R. D. Kristy, E. D. Wahyuni, and N. Hayatin, “Analysis of The Readiness Level of Children Encyclopedia Using Technology Readiness Index (TRI),” J. Repos., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 129, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.22219/repositor.v2i2.385.

M. Humbani and M. Wiese, “A Cashless Society for All: Determining Consumers’ Readiness to Adopt Mobile Payment Services,” J. African Bus., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 409–429, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/15228916.2017.1396792.

W. A. Aldea and B. E. V. Comendador, “Student universal cash card using radio frequency identification,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Telecommunications and Communication Engineering, Nov. 2019, pp. 11–15, doi: 10.1145/3369555.3369581.

H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, pp. 333–339, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

H. Taherdoost, “Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research,” SSRN Electron. J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 18–27, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3205035.

H. Wu and S.-O. Leung, “Can Likert Scales be Treated as Interval Scales?—A Simulation Study,” J. Soc. Serv. Res., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 527–532, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775.

M. Azwar and S. Sulthonah, “The Utilization of Instagram as a Media Promotion : the Case Study of Library in Indonesia,” Insa. J. Islam Humanit., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 147–159, May 2018, doi: 10.15408/insaniyat.v2i2.7320.

A. Mulyapradana and A. D. Anjarini, “The Influence of Entrepreneurship Subjects,Entrepreneurial Motivation, Family Support for Entrepreneurial Decision Making in Pusmanu Polytechnic Office Administration Students,” Pros. ICSMR, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 162–182, Aug. 2020, Accessed: Apr. 14, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://conference.loupiasconference.org/ .

M. Lakhwani, O. Dastane, N. S. M. Satar, and Z. Johari, “The Impact of Technology Adoption on Organizational Productivity,” J. Ind. Distrib. Bus., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 7–18, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no4.7.

S. Tsang, C. Royse, and A. Terkawi, “Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine,” Saudi J. Anaesth., vol. 11, no. 5, p. 80, May 2017, doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

M. Khairul Anam, Indra Prayogo, Susandri, Yoyon Efendi, Erlin, & nurjayadi. (2022). The Readiness Analysis of Smart School Implementation Using Technology Readiness Index to Support Smart City Implementation. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 6(2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v6i2.507

Issue

Section

Articles