Digital village system transformation to increase the potential of Sidemen Village Karangasem Bali

Authors

  • Ni Luh Ayu Kartika Yuniastari Sarja Politeknik Negeri Bali
  • Ida Ayu Gde Suwiprabayanti Putra Universitas Udayana
  • Nyoman Ayu Nila Dewi ITB STIKOM Bali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v8i1.674

Keywords:

Sidemen Village, Digital Village, Website, TAM, SDLC

Abstract

Sidemen Village is one of the villages in Karangasem Regency. The most famous products from Sidemen Village are songket cloth and lontar comics. Seeing the potential that exists in Sidemen Village, it is necessary to develop a Digital Village in Sidemen Village, Karangasem. Digital villages will help improve communication between village officials and fellow village officials and with village residents. The research method uses the SDLC method which includes planning, analysis, design, implementation, and testing stages. At the planning stage, data is collected which will later be used in the analysis process. At the analysis stage, an analysis of functional requirements is carried out as a basis for the Digital Village website design process. At the design stage, the design of the Digital Village website is carried out in the form of database design to show what data is processed on the website. At the implementation stage, implementation is carried out in the form of website page implementation. At testing stage, data is collected through questionnaires and testing using the TAM method using the SPSS application. The system produces 10 features on the website in the form of: Admin Login, Village Resident Login, Village Information, Village Information Dashboard, Land Dashboard, Correspondence Dashboard, Assistance Dashboard, Financial Dashboard, Village Resident Dashboard. Based on the results of hypothesis testing from the proposed model, it is known that there is only 1 hypothesis that is accepted, namely the influence of PEOU on ATU, which means that the belief that the application can be easily understood and used has an influence on acceptance or rejection of the use of the application as a result when someone uses an application in a particular job or activity.

References

I. G. A. N. Astari, “Cultural Tourism Development Strategy Of Tenganan Pegringsingan Pegringsingan Village In Karangasem Regency,” Int. J. Kybernology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 198–205, 2022, Accessed: May 04, 2024. [Online]. Available at: https://ejournal.ipdn.ac.id/IJOK/article/view/1221.

I. K. M. Putra, N. W. Sumetri, N. L. P. I. Rumini, I. W. E. D. Rahmanu, C. G. P. Yudistira, and K. D. C. Putra, “The Study on Village Tourist Potential Exploration in Karangasem Regency,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Social Science (ICAST-SS 2020), Apr. 2021, vol. 544, pp. 400–405, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210424.077.

N. Wijana and I. G. A. N. Setiawan, “Mapping and Distribution of Useful Plant Species in Bukit Kangin Forest, Pegringsingan Village, Karangasem, Bali,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Innovative Research Across Disciplines (ICIRAD 2019), Jan. 2020, pp. 87–94, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200115.015.

Komang Krishna Yogantara, Putu Agus Prayogi, Sulistyoadi Joko Saharjo, and Made Hedy Wartana, “Village Tourist Assistance In Developing Village Potential Through Digital Promotion In Tangkup Village Sidemen District, Karangasem Bali,” Synerg. Soc. Serv., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–34, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.51713/save.v2i1.57.

I. V. M. Ayodyani, F. S. Nazeer, and A. M. L. De Alwis, “Smart village concept for rural area development in Sri Lanka: a study on implementation, benefits, and challenges,” in 11th World Construction Symposium - 2023, Jul. 2023, vol. 1, pp. 930–943, doi: 10.31705/WCS.2023.75.

A. M. Ciruela-Lorenzo, A. R. Del-Aguila-Obra, A. Padilla-Meléndez, and J. J. Plaza-Angulo, “Digitalization of Agri-Cooperatives in the Smart Agriculture Context. Proposal of a Digital Diagnosis Tool,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 1325, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12041325.

S. A. Asri, I. N. G. A. Astawa, I. G. A. M. Sunaya, I. M. R. Adi Nugroho, and W. Setiawan, “Implementation of Asynchronous Microservices Architecture on Smart Village Application,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 12, no. 3, p. 1236, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.13897.

A. Ilham, A. Munir, A. Ala, and A. A. Sulaiman, “The smart village program challenges in supporting national food security through the implementation of agriculture 4.0,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1107, no. 1, p. 012097, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1107/1/012097.

M. Ilham Alhari and A. A. Nur Fajrillah, “Enterprise Architecture: A Strategy to Achieve e-Government Dimension of Smart Village Using TOGAF ADM 9.2,” JOIV Int. J. Informatics Vis., vol. 6, no. 2–2, p. 540, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.30630/joiv.6.2-2.1147.

Z. Pourzolfaghar, V. Bastidas, and M. Helfert, “Standardisation of enterprise architecture development for smart cities,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1336–1357, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13132-019-00601-8.

H. V. F. Kainde and I. N. Y. A. Wijaya, “Design Architecture of Jembrana E-government System,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 265–270, Dec. 2020. [Online]. Available at: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/informatika/article/view/32599.

B. Anthony Jnr, S. A. Petersen, and J. Krogstie, “A model to evaluate the acceptance and usefulness of enterprise architecture for digitalization of cities,” Kybernetes, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 422–447, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/K-07-2021-0565/FULL/XML.

G. M. Jonathan, L. Rusu, and E. Perjons, “Business-IT Alignment in the Era of Digital Transformation: Quo Vadis?,” in Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2020, vol. 2020-Janua, pp. 5563–5572, doi: 10.24251/HICSS.2020.685.

M. J. W. Peeters, A. Rahbech, and P. thor Straten, “TAM-ing T cells in the tumor microenvironment: implications for TAM receptor targeting,” Cancer Immunol. Immunother., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 237–244, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02421-w.

J. D. Bryan and T. Zuva, “A Review on TAM and TOE Framework Progression and How These Models Integrate,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 137–145, May 2021, doi: 10.25046/aj060316.

A. Ahmad, T. Rasul, A. Yousaf, and U. Zaman, “Understanding Factors Influencing Elderly Diabetic Patients’ Continuance Intention to Use Digital Health Wearables: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 81, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/joitmc6030081.

L. Zhou, S. Xue, and R. Li, “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Students’ Intention to Use an Online Education Platform at a University in China,” SAGE Open, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 215824402210852, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1177/21582440221085259.

E. M. Abu-Taieh et al., “Continued Intention to Use of M-Banking in Jordan by Integrating UTAUT, TPB, TAM and Service Quality with ML,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 120, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/joitmc8030120.

G. A. Putri, A. K. Widagdo, and D. Setiawan, “Analysis of financial technology acceptance of peer to peer lending (P2P lending) using extended technology acceptance model (TAM),” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 100027, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100027.

A. A. Hamid, F. Z. A. Razak, A. A. Bakar, and W. S. W. Abdullah, “The Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on Continuance Intention to Use E-Government,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 35, pp. 644–649, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00079-4.

W. M. Alenazy, W. Mugahed Al-Rahmi, and M. S. Khan, “Validation of TAM Model on Social Media Use for Collaborative Learning to Enhance Collaborative Authoring,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 71550–71562, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2920242.

A. Robles-Gomez, L. Tobarra, R. Pastor-Vargas, R. Hernandez, and J. M. Haut, “Analyzing the Users’ Acceptance of an IoT Cloud Platform Using the UTAUT/TAM Model,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 150004–150020, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3125497.

D. Rad et al., “A Preliminary Investigation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Early Childhood Education and Care,” BRAIN. Broad Res. Artif. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 518–533, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.18662/brain/13.1/297.

A. S. Al-Adwan, N. Li, A. Al-Adwan, G. A. Abbasi, N. A. Albelbisi, and A. Habibi, ““Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms”,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 15381–15413, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-06

How to Cite

Ni Luh Ayu Kartika Yuniastari Sarja, Ida Ayu Gde Suwiprabayanti Putra, & Nyoman Ayu Nila Dewi. (2024). Digital village system transformation to increase the potential of Sidemen Village Karangasem Bali. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 8(1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v8i1.674