A comparative study of artificial intelligence in education psychology: the cases of Indonesia and Thailand

Authors

  • Sitriah Salim Utina IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo
  • Tutut Chusniyah Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Jittakorn Inseachiangmai Lao National University
  • Gebi Angelina Zahra Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Kukuh Setyo Pambudi Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v8i1.663

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Education, Cross-cultural, Indonesia, Thailand

Abstract

Various applications of artificial intelligence (AI) are currently being developed to enhance and transform the educational experience. However, things like culture, society, and ethics may have an impact on how artificial intelligence is implemented in classrooms all around the world. This study aims to analyze the existing use of AI in education in two Southeast Asian nations, namely Indonesia and Thailand, and to compare those two environments in terms of their potential. Specifically, the research will focus on Indonesia. We gathered papers, publications, and websites from both countries in order to perform an in-depth analysis as part of a comprehensive literature study that we carried out. The ethical and social repercussions of using AI in education, the best practices and suggestions for using AI in education, the possibilities and problems presented by using AI in education, and the preparedness and obstructions presented by using AI in education. Our study demonstrates that there are parallels and variances between the perceptions and experiences of educators and students from the two nations about the use of AI in educational settings, and it also makes recommendations for future research and practice

References

N. Berente, B. Gu, J. Recker, and R. Santhanam, “Special Issue Editor’s Comments: Managing Artificial Intelligence,” Manag. Inf. Syst. Q., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1433–1450, Sep. 2021.[Online]. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol45/iss3/16/.

L. Chen, P. Chen, and Z. Lin, “Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 75264–75278, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.

K.-Y. Tang, C.-Y. Chang, and G.-J. Hwang, “Trends in artificial intelligence-supported e-learning: a systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–2019),” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 2134–2152, May 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1875001.

X. Chen, H. Xie, and G.-J. Hwang, “A multi-perspective study on Artificial Intelligence in Education: grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 1, p. 100005, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100005.

W. Yang, “Artificial Intelligence education for young children: Why, what, and how in curriculum design and implementation,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, p. 100061, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100061.

A. Nguyen, H. N. Ngo, Y. Hong, B. Dang, and B.-P. T. Nguyen, “Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4221–4241, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w.

G.-J. Hwang, H. Xie, B. W. Wah, and D. Gašević, “Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 1, p. 100001, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001.

W. Holmes et al., “Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 504–526, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.

M. D. Pancawati, “The Face of Indonesian Education in ASEAN,” Kompas.id, 2020. [Online]. Available at: https://www.kompas.id/baca/riset/2020/08/06/wajah-pendidikan-indonesia-di-asean.

M. Griffiths and L. B. Forcier, Intelligence Unleashed, no. February. p. 60, 2016. [Online]. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1475756/.

W. Holmes, M. Bialik, and C. Fadel, Artificial Intelligence In Education Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. United States of America: Center for Curriculum Redisgn, p. 39, 2019. [Online]. Available at: https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AIED-Book-Excerpt-CCR.pdf.

U. D. Library, “Draft Recommendation on Open Educational Resources,” in UNESCO. General Conference, 40th, 2019, p. 12. [Online]. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370936.

Stéphan Vincent-Lancrin and R. van der Vlies, “Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Promises and challenges,” 218, p. 17, 2020. [Online]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/education/trustworthy-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-education-a6c90fa9-en.htm.

S. Chitturu, D.-Y. Lin, K. Sneader, O. Tonby, and J. Woetzel, “Artificial Intelligence and Southeast Asia ’ S Future,” McKinsey Glob. Inst. Prod. Singapore Summit 2017, no. September, p. 40, 2017, [Online]. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured Insights/Artificial Intelligence/AI and SE ASIA future/Artificial-intelligence-and-Southeast-Asias-future.ashx.

A. C. Graesser et al., “ElectronixTutor: an intelligent tutoring system with multiple learning resources for electronics,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 15, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0110-y.

N. S. F. Putri, P. Widiharso, A. B. P. Utama, M. C. Shakti, and U. Ghosh, “Natural Language Processing in Higher Education,” Bull. Soc. Informatics Theory Appl., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 90–101, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.31763/businta.v6i1.593.

P. Smutny and P. Schreiberova, “Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger,” Comput. Educ., vol. 151, p. 103862, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862.

G. H. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, 1st ed. SAGE, p. 327, 1984. [Online]. Available at: https://books.google.com/books/about/Culture_s_Consequences.html?id=Cayp_Um4O9gC.

E. Z. Sabella and E. T. Hall, Beyond Culture., Reprint, R., vol. 7, no. 4. p. 320, Knopf Doubleday, 1976, doi: 10.2307/2064404.

E. Sediyono, Z. A. Hasibuan, I. Setyawan, E. Purnama Harahap, and A. Darmawan, “Systematic Analysis of Digital Knowledge Management Applications Based on Artificial Intelligence at Universities,” ADI Bisnis Digit. Interdisiplin J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 28–40, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.34306/abdi.v3i2.790.

R. Astagisa, R. Dwi Aldiansyah, M. Minan Chusni, P. Studi Pendidikan Fisika, and U. Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, “The Important Role of Artificial Intelligence in Developing Learning Methods for Students in Indonesia,” in Proceedings of the National Seminar (Collaboration between Education and Industry), Jun. 2022, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 228–235. [Online]. Available at: https://prosiding.ikippgribojonegoro.ac.id/index.php/KPDI/article/view/1294.

Z. Zakaria, T. Sukomardojo, S. Sugiyem, G. Razali, and I. Iskandar, “Preparing Students for Future Careers Through Technology-Based Education: Examining the Important Role of Artificial Intelligence,” J. Educ., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 14141–14155, Mar. 2023. [Online]. Available at: https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/2436.

UNESCO, “Beijing Consensus on Artificial Intelligence and Education,” in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, Planning Education in the AI Era: Lead the Leap,Beijing 2019, 2019, p. 70. [Online]. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368303.

W. Kopp and B. S. Thomsen, “How AI can transform education for students and teachers,” World Economic Forum, 2023. [Online]. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/05/ai-accelerate-students-holistic-development-teaching-fulfilling/.

G. Singh, G. Kaur, and L. Thaemphan, “Artificial Intelligence In Esl - A Survey On School Students And Teachers In Ubon Ratchathani Thailand,” In The 11th AISOFOLL: Facing Industrial Revolution 4.0 through Language Education, 2020, no. October, pp. 344–349, [Online]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Moch-Mardjuki/publication/352179059_Prosiding_AISOFOLL.

B. D. Nye, A. C. Graesser, and X. Hu, “AutoTutor and Family: A Review of 17 Years of Natural Language Tutoring,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 427–469, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s40593-014-0029-5.

W. Ma, O. O. Adesope, J. C. Nesbit, and Q. Liu, “Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 901–918, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1037/a0037123.

K. VanLEHN, “The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 197–221, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.611369.

M. D. Shermis and J. Burstein, Automated Essay Scoring. Routledge, pp. 1-230, 2003, doi: 10.4324/9781410606860.

T. Zhang, V. Kishor, F. Wu, K. Q. Weinberger, and Y. Artzi, “Bertscore: Evaluating Text Generation With Bert,” in ICLR 2020, 2020, pp. 1–43, [Online]. Available at: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=SkeHuCVFDr.

M. Chaudhry and E. Kazim, “Artificial Intelligence in Education (Aied) a High-Level Academic and Industry Note 2021,” SSRN Electron. J., p. 14, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3833583.

C. W. Okonkwo and A. Ade-Ibijola, “Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 2, p. 100033, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033.

E. Kecerdasan Buatan dan Pentingnya Ilmu Etika and M. Reskiantio Pabubung, “The Epistemology of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Importance of Ethics in Interdisciplinary Education,” J. Filsafat Indones., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 152–159, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.23887/JFI.V4I2.34734.

S. Buckingham Shum, R. Ferguson, and R. Martinez-Maldonado, “Human-Centred Learning Analytics,” J. Learn. Anal., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–9, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.18608/jla.2019.62.1.

P. Prinsloo and S. Slade, “An elephant in the learning analytics room,” in Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, Mar. 2017, pp. 46–55, doi: 10.1145/3027385.3027406.

D. Manongga, U. Rahardja, I. Sembiring, N. Lutfiani, and A. B. Yadila, “RETRACTED (Withdrawn): The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Education,” ADI Bisnis Digit. Interdisiplin J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 41–55, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.34306/abdi.v3i2.792.

R. Luckin, W. Holmes, M. Griffiths, and L. B. F. Pearson, Intelligence Unleashed An argument for AI in Education. Pearson, p. 60, 2016. [Online]. Available at: https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/edu.google.com/id//pdfs/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf.

M.-I. Dascalu, C.-N. Bodea, M. Lytras, P. O. de Pablos, and A. Burlacu, “Improving e-learning communities through optimal composition of multidisciplinary learning groups,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 30, pp. 362–371, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.022.

Misnawati Misnawati, “ChatGPT: Benefits, Risks, And Wise Use In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Education, Language, Literature, Arts, And Culture, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 54–67, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.55606/mateandrau.v2i1.221.

N. Toon and P. C. Cbe, “Global AI Summit,” Tortoise, no. december, p. 22, 2020, [Online]. Available at: https://www.tortoisemedia.com/intelligence/global-ai/%0Ahttps://www.tortoisemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/12/Global-AI-Index-Methodology-3.0-211201-v2.pdf.

M. T. Machmud, A. P. Widiyan, and N. R. Ramadhani, “The development and policies of ICT supporting educational technology in Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, and Myanmar,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20786.

“World Development Indicators,” DataBank, 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.

UNESCO, “Fourth consolidated report on the implementation by Member States of the 2003 Recommendation concerning the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism and Universal Access to Cyberspace - UNESCO Digital Library,” in UNESCO. General Conference, 40th, 2019, 2019, p. 6. [Online]. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370315.

UNESCO, AI and education: guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO, p 45, 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709.

C. Pazzanese, “Ethical concerns mount as AI takes bigger decision-making role,” Harvard Gazette, 2020. [Online]. Available at: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/10/ethical-concerns-mount-as-ai-takes-bigger-decision-making-role/.

C. Visaltanachoti and C. Viriyavejakul ThaninRatanaolarn, “Teaching English to Thai Students using an Artificial Intelligence Technology Algorithmic Model: A Prototype Analysis,” Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ., vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 5623–5630, 2021, [Online]. Available at: https://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/11718.

D. N. Melo, “AI In The Classroom: Benefits, Challenges, And Best Practices,” Elearning Industry, 2023. [Online]. Available at: https://elearningindustry.com/incorporating-artificial-intelligence-into-classroom-examination-benefits-challenges-and-best-practices.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-02

How to Cite

Utina, S. S., Chusniyah, T. ., Inseachiangmai, J. ., Zahra, G. A. ., & Pambudi, K. S. . (2024). A comparative study of artificial intelligence in education psychology: the cases of Indonesia and Thailand. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 8(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v8i1.663